THE END
DAYS
How do we know that Maitreya is the
Anti-Christ?
I. Jesus Christ is the Only-Begotten Son of God and Our
Lord and God
First, we are going to show, on the authority of God -- the true
Author of the Sacred Scripture -- and on the authority of His
divine institution -- His Mystical Body, the infallible Holy Roman
Catholic Church, which approved the Sacred Scripture -- that Jesus
Christ is the Only-Begotten Son of God, and that He is Our Lord and
God.
Matthew 16:15-17. "Jesus saith to them: But
whom do you say that I am? Simon Peter answered and said: Thou art
Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answering said to him:
Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not
revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in heaven."
Matthew 26:63-64. "But Jesus held his peace.
And the high priest said to him: I adjure thee by the living God, that
thou tell us if thou be the Christ the Son of God. Jesus saith to him:
Thou hast said it. Nevertheless I say to you, hereafter you shall see
the Son of man sitting on the right hand of the power of God and coming
in the clouds of heaven."
Luke 22:66-70. "And as soon as it was day,
the
ancients of the people and the chief priests and scribes came together.
And
they brought him into their council saying: If thou be the Christ, tell
us.
And he saith to them: If I shall tell you, you will not believe me. And
if
I shall also ask you, you will not answer me, nor let me go. But
hereafter
the Son of man shall be sitting on the right hand of the power of God.
Then
said they all: Art thou then the Son of God? And he said: You say that
I
am."
After the resurrection, Jesus visited the Apostles.
Matthew 20:24-29. "Now Thomas, one of the
twelve, who is called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came. The
other disciples therefore said to him: We have seen the Lord. But he
said to them: Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails
and put my finger into the place of the nails and put my hand into his
side, I will not believe. And after eight days, again his disciples
were within, and Thomas with them. Jesus
cometh, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst and said: Peace be
to
you. Then he said to Thomas: Put in thy finger hither and see my hands.
And
bring hither the hand and put it into my side. And be not faithless,
but
believing. Thomas answered and said to him: My
Lord and my God. Jesus saith to him:
Because
thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen and have believed."
II Maitreya denies Jesus Christ born 2,000 years ago to
be the
ONLY-BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD and claims himself to be just that.
Based on his teaching materials at his web site "www.maitreya.org" ,
he previously quoted Matthew 24: 4-5 with the name Jesus being changed to Esa.
This is Maitreya's quotation: "And in answer Esa said to them, 'Take care that no one leads you astray.
For many will come in my name, saying, 'I am the Christ,' and they will
lead many
astray."
The true quotation of Matthew 24: 4-5 is: "And
Jesus
answering, said to them: Take heed that no man seduce you. For many
will come in my
name saying, I am Christ. And they will seduce many."
His so-called disciple, in the latest revision of his web site,
quotes Mark (13: 37) as "Thus Esa warned all future
humanity through His followers: And what I say unto you, I say unto
all, Watch!" Everything inside the double quotations is
meant to be the quotation of verse 37 chapter 13 in the Gospel of St.
Mark.
But the true quotation of Mark (13: 37) is "And
what I say to you, I say to all: Watch." The sentence "Thus Esa warned all future humanity through His followers:"
is added to the Gospel of St. Mark. Esa
here, just as in the false quotation of the Gospel of St. Matthew, is
used instead of Jesus.
One may ask, "what is the name Esa
by which Maitreya calls Jesus?" In
other words, who is Esa?
In order to answer this riddle, we need to review some basic
philosophy and its Latin language. Let's quote Jacques Maritain, a
well-known Catholic philosopher, a professor at the Pontifical
Institute of Medieval Studies
in Toronto, appointed to chairs at Universities of Chicago, Columbia,
and
Princeton from 1948 to 1961. In his book An Introduction to
Philosophy
(first published 1930, reprinted by Christian Classics, Westminster MD
21157,
1991), we find:
"We are compelled ... to admit a cause which moves without being
moved, causes without being caused, cannot lack existence, contains in
its purity the perfection of which things partake in greater or less
degree, possesses an intellect which is the final ground of all natures
and the first principle of all things. Such a cause we term God; it is
pure act, deriving its existence from itself (a se). In other words, being itself is
its nature or essence, it is subsistent Being itself: he who
is." (Maritain, ibid., page 180)
"A thing is said to exist in itself
(in se) when it does not
exist
as part of a whole previously existing, but itself constitutes the
whole
which exists. In this sense Peter exists in himself." (Maritain,
ibid.,
page 163.)
"A thing is said to exist by itself or in virtue of itself (per
se) when it is brought into existence in virtue of
itself, or of its own nature (by the causes on which it depends, if it
is a created nature). In this
sense Peter exists per se."
(Maritain, ibid., page 163.)
"That which exists a se
or from itself, possessing in
itself
the entire explanation of its existence, is uncaused; God alone is from himself, a se. Created substances on the
contrary (created
subjects of action) are caused; they exist per
se, in virtue of their essence; they do not exist a se. In their own nature they possess
everything
necessary to receive existence, but not to possess an existence not
received
from without. They are sufficient by themselves to exist, in the
strictly
qualified sense that they do not exist as something which belongs to
something
else, but, absolutely speaking, they are by no means a sufficient
ground
of their own existence." (Maritain, ibid., page 163)
"That which is a se
cannot cease to exist; that which is per se
without being a se can lose
its existence." (Maritain, ibid., p. 164.)
It is clear from philosophy that a creature like Peter exists in se and per
se but not a se.
Only God exists a se.
Recall that many years ago in some recording cassette tapes sold by
satan-worshipping musicians/singers there are some lyrics that if you
play them back in reverse you will hear the words like "kill yourself",
"commit suicide", "worship satan".
The same principle applies here. The reverse of a se is es
a, or esa.
The reverse of the Uncreated (God, a se)
is the created, the esa. Thus,
it is quite clear that Maitreya craftily hides his blasphemy and denial
of Jesus to be God under
the name Esa.
By downgrading Jesus to be a mere man, Maitreya denies that Jesus is
God and therefore the Only-Begotten Son of God, the Christ, the
Messiah. Instead, on his web site, he claims himself to be the
Only-Begotten Son of God, the Christ, the Messiah. In other words, he
implicitly accuses Our Lord Jesus Christ to be a fraud, an impostor,
the same name that King Herod Agrippa and
other founders of the Masonry used to call Jesus.
III. Denial of Jesus Christ as the Only-Begotten Son of God
and the Christ incurs anathema from the Catholic Church.
Council of Nicea I in 325 declared against the Arians who did not
believe in the divine nature of Jesus Christ:
The Nicene Creed
We believe in one God the Father almighty,
creator of all things visible and invisible. And in our one Lord Jesus
Christ the Son of God, the only-begotten born of the Father, that is of
the substance of the Father, God of God, light of light, true God of
true God, born, not made, of one substance with the Father (which they
call in Greek "homousion"), by whom all things were made, which
are in heaven and on earth, who for our salvation came down, and became
incarnate and was made man, and suffered, and arose again on the third
day, and ascended into heaven, and will come to judge the living and
the dead. And in the Holy Spirit.
But those who say: "There was [a time]
when he was not," and, "Before he was born, he was not," and "Because
he was
made from non-existing matter, he is either of another substance or
essence,"
and those who call "God the Son of God changeable and mutable," these
the
Catholic Church anathematizes. (Denzinger,
The Sources of Catholic Dogma, 30th Edition, # 54, p. 26)
Pope St. Leo IX on his epistle "Congratulamur vehementer" to Peter,
Bishop of Antioch, April 13, 1053 declared the symbol
of faith:
For I firmly believe that the Holy Trinity,
the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, is one omnipotent God, and
in the Trinity the whole Godhead is co-essential and consubstantial,
co-eternal
aud co-omnipotent, all things, through whom all things, in whom all
things
[Rom. 11:36] which are in heaven or on earth, visible or invisible.
Likewise
I believe that each person in the Holy Trinity is the one true God,
complete and perfect.
I believe also that the Son of God the
Father, the Word of God, was born eternallly before all time from the
Father, consubstantial, co-omnipotent, and co-equal to the Father
through all things in divinity; born of the Holy Spirit from the ever
virgin Mary in time, with a rational soul, having two nativities, the
one from the Father, eternal, the other
from the Mother, in time; having two wills and opcrations, true God and
true
man, individual in each nature and perfect, not having suffered a
fusion
and division, not adopted or phantastical, the one and onlv God, the
Son
of God in two natures, but in the singleness of one person, incapable
of
suffering and immortal in divinity; but in humanity for us and for our
salvation
suffered in the true passion of the body and was buried, and arose from
the
dead on the third day in the true resurrection of the body; because of
which
we must declare with the disciples that He ate from no need of food but
only
from will and power; on the fortieth day after His resurrection with
the
flesh in which He arose, and with His soul He ascended into heaven and
sits
at the right hand of the Father, whence on the tenth day He sent the
Holy
Spirit, and thence, as He ascended, He will come to judge the living
and
the dead, and will render to each one according to his works.
I believe also that the Holy Spirit,
complete and perfect and true God, proceeding from the Father and the
Son, co-equal, co-essential, co-omnipotent and coeternal with the
Father and the Son in
all respects, has spoken through the prophets.
That this holy and individual Trinity is
not three Gods, but in three persons and in one nature and or essence
[is] one God omnipotent, external, invisible and incommutable, so I
believe and confess, so that I may truly proclaim that the Father is
not begotten, the Son is the
only begotten one, and the Holy Spirit is neither begotten nor
unbegotten, but proceeds from the Father and the Son.
I believe that the one true Church is holy,
Catholic and apostolic, in which is given one baptism and the true
remission of all sins. I also believe in a true resurrection of this
body, which now I bear, and in eternal life.
I believe also that there is one author
of
the New and Old Testament of the law both of the Prophets and of the
Apostles, namely the omnipotent God and Lord. (I believe) that God
predestined only the good things, but that He foreknew the good and the
evil. I believe and profess that the grace of God precedes and follows
man, yet in such a manner that I do not deny free will to the rational
creature. I also believe and declare that the soul is not a part of God
but was created from nothing and was without baptism subject to
original sin.
Furthermore, I declare anathema every
heresy raising itself against the holy Catholic Church, and likewise
him whosoever has honored or believes that any writings beyond those
which the Catholic Church accepts ought to be held in authority or has
venerated them. I accept entirely the four Councils and I venerate them
as the four Gospels, because through four parts of the world the
universal Church, upon these as on square stone, has been founded
. . . . Equally I accept and venerate the three remaining Councils. . .
. Whatever the above mentioned seven holy and universal Councils
believe and praise I also believe and praise, and whomever they declare
anathema, I declare anathema. (Denzinger,
The Sources of Catholic Dogma, 30th Edition, # 343-349, p.
141-142)
IV. Is Maitreya an Anti-Christ?
Let's quote the Sacred Scripture to see whether Maitreya can be
called an Anti-Christ.
1 John 2:22-23. "Who is a liar, but he who
denieth that Jesus is the Christ? This is Antichrist, who denieth the
Father and the
Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father. He that
confesseth
the Son hath the Father also."
John 5:23. "That all men may honour the
Son, as they honour the Father. He who honoureth not the Son honoureth
not the Father who hath sent him."
John 4:1-3. " Dearly beloved, believe
not every spirit, but try the spirits if they be of God: because many
false prophets are gone out into the world. By this is the spirit of
God known. Every spirit which confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in
the flesh is of God: And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus is not of
God. And this is Antichrist, of whom you have heard that he cometh: and
he is now already in the world."
Note 1: Try the spirits...
Viz., by examining whether their teaching be agreeable to the rule of
the
Catholic faith, and the doctrine of the church. For as he says, (ver.
6,)
He that knoweth God, heareth us [the pastors of the church]. By this we
know
the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.
Note 2: Every spirit which confesseth,
etc... Not that the confession of this point of faith alone, is, at all
times, and in all cases, sufficient; but that with relation to that
time,
and for that part of the Christian doctrine, which was then
particularly
to be confessed, taught, and maintained against the heretics of those
days,
this was the most proper token, by which the true teachers might be
distinguished
form the false.
Note 3: That dissolveth Jesus...
Viz., either by denying his humanity, or his divinity.
John 5:10-12. " He that believeth in the
Son of God hath the testimony of God in himself. He that believeth not
the Son maketh him a liar: because he believeth not in the testimony
which God hath testified of his Son. And this is the testimony that God
hath given to us eternal life. And this life is in his Son. He that
hath the Son hath life. He that hath not the Son hath not life."
Note: He that believeth not the Son,
etc... By refusing to believe the testimonies given by the three divine
persons, that Jesus was the Messias, and the true Son of God, by whom
eternal
life is obtained and promised to all that comply with his doctrine. In
him
we have also this lively confidence, that we shall obtain whatever we
ask,
according to his will, when we ask what is for our good, with
perseverance,
and in the manner we ought. And this we know, and have experience of,
by
having obtained the petitions that we have made.
The above quotations from the Sacred Scripture show beyond doubt that
Maitreya is an Anti-Christ. But this Anti-Christ is not just any other
Anti-Christ who simply claims to be God. This Anti-Christ will have the
support of almost all mankind as he will unify all religions of the
world. This unification can only be done on a worldwide scale when
communication technology is sufficiently advanced as in the present.
Moreover, behind him is the financial, political, and military power of
the world. This Anti-Christ is like no other Anti-Christ. Thus, he can
be truly called the Anti-Christ.
The coming of the Anti-Christ has already been prophesied in the
Gospel by Our Lord Jesus Christ 2,000 years ago:
John 5:43. "I am come in the name of my
Father,
and you receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him you
will
receive."
Worship of God is required of all creature including Maitreya. By
refusing to recognize Jesus as the Messiah and the Christ, Maitreya
refuses to kneel down before Jesus to worship Him as God. Let's quote
the Sacred Scripture.
Philippians 2:5-11. "For let this mind be in
you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who being in the form of God,
thought it not
robbery to be equal with God: But emptied himself, taking the form of a
servant,
being made in the likeness of men, and in habit found as a man. He
humbled
himself, becoming obedient unto death, even to the death of the cross.
For
which cause, God also hath exalted him and hath given him a name which
is
above all names: That in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of
those
that are in heaven, on earth, and under the earth: And that every
tongue
should confess that the Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the
Father."
(Note: Emptied himself, exinanivit... made himself as of
no account.)
Why does Maitreya refuse to worship Jesus as God? Because he claims
himself to be God and will demand worship from man.
2 Thessalonians 2: 3-4. "Let no man deceive
you by any means: for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of
sin be revealed, the son of perdition who opposeth and is lifted up
above all that is called God or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth
in the temple of God,
shewing himself as if he were God."
(Note: A revolt... the general apostasy, falling away from
the true faith, that occurs before the coming of the great Anti-Christ.
The
man of sin... Here must be meant some particular man, as is evident
from
the frequent repetition of the Greek article ò, the man of sin,
the
son of perdition, the adversary or opposer. It agrees to the wicked and
great Antichrist, who will come before the second Coming of Jesus
Christ)
V Maitreya's teaching that all religions, as represented
by the seven great religions contained in his great sign, form eternal
divine path capable of leading to God directly contradicts Our Lord
Jesus Christ's teaching.
John 11:25-26. "Jesus said to her: I am the
resurrection and the life: he that believeth in me, although he be
dead, shall live: And every one that liveth and believeth in me shall
not die for ever."
John 8:12. "Again therefore, Jesus spoke to:
them, saying: I am the light of the world. He that followeth me walketh
not in darkness,
but shall have the light of life."
John 12:46. "I am come, a light into the
world,
that whosoever believeth in me may not remain in darkness."
Our Lord Jesus Christ, true God and true Man, has taught that there is
only one way leading to God, one truth leading to The Eternal Truth and
Eternal Life. And yet, Maitreya claims that all religions lead to God,
the Divine Truth.
John 14:6. "Jesus saith to him: I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by me."
John 17:3. "Now this is eternal life: That
they may know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast
sent."
Moreover, there is no other name who can save mankind except Jesus
Christ. Yet Maitreya claims he can save mankind.
Acts 4:12. "Neither is there salvation in any
other. For there is no other name under heaven given to men, whereby we
must be saved."
Since there is only one truth, the truth taught be Our Lord Jesus
Christ who was born about 2,000 years ago, the other teaching by
Maitreya must
be false. And no one can lead man to God except through Jesus Christ.
Thus
Maitreya's claim that the path represented by all major religions lead
to
God must be false. Since there is only one name that can save man and
that
name is Jesus Christ, Maitreya's claim of saving man must be false.
Galatians 1:8-9. "But though we, or an angel
from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached
to you, let him be anathema. As we said before, so now I say again: If
any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received,
let him be anathema."
Thus, if anyone including Maitreya who teaches a gospel that is
different from the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ, he would bring on
himself an anathema.
But it is not enough to believe in Jesus Christ to be saved. To be
saved, one has belong to the Holy Roman Catholic Church, outside of
which there
is no salvation. Various Popes in the past has defined ex-cathedra the dogma "Outside the Roman Catholic Church there is no
salvation" (extra Ecclesiam nullam
esse salutem) and has condemned the
error of indifferentism which says that all religions can
save.
Pope Boniface VIII in the Bull "Unam Sanctam", November 18, 1302,
declared ex-cathedra:
"We firmly believe and simply confess this
(Church) outside which there is no salvation nor remission of sin." (Denzinger, The Sources of Catholic Dogma,
30th Edition, # 468, p. 186)
(Note: the Bull is the most authoritative document of the Church
which the Pope signs and seals with his ring [bulla].)
"Furthermore, we declare, say, define,
and
proclaim to every human creature that they by necessity for salvation
are
entirely subject to the Roman Pontiff." (Denzinger, ibid.
, 30th Edition, # 469, p. 187)
Pope Eugene IV declared ex-cathedra
in the Bull "Cantata Domino" on February 4, 1442:
"It (the Roman Catholic Church) firmly
believes, professes, and proclaims that those
not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews
and heretics and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal
life, but will depart "into everlasting fire which was prepared for the
devil and his angels" [Matthew 25:4I], unless before the end of life the same have been
added to the flock; and that the unity of
the ecclesiastical body is so strong that only to those remaining in it
are the sacraments of the Church of benefit for salvation, and do
fastings, almsgiving, and other functions of piety and
exercises of Christian service produce eternal reward, and that no one,
whatever
almsgiving he has practiced, even if he has shed blood for the name of
Christ,
can be saved, unless he has remained in the bosom and unity of the
Catholic
Church." (Denzinger, Op. Cit., 30th Edition, # 714,
p.
230).
Pope Pius IV in the Bull "Iniunctum Nobis", November 13, 1565, declared
ex-cathedra:
"This true Catholic faith, outside of which
no one can be saved." (Denzinger,
Op. Cit., 30th Edition, # 1000, p. 304)
Pope Gregory XVI, in his Encyclical "Mirari Vos" On Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism,
August, 15, 1832, pronounced against the
error of indifferentism which Maitreya proclaims:
"14. We now come to another and most
fruitful cause of the evils which at present afflict the Church and
which We so bitterly deplore; We mean
indifferentism, or that fatal opinion everywhere diffused by the craft
of the wicked, that men can by the
profession of any faith obtain the eternal
salvation of their souls, provided their life conforms to justice and
probity. But in a question so clear and
evident it will undoubtedly be easy for Us to pluck up from amid the
people confided to your care so pernicious an error. The apostle warns
us of it: "One God, one faith, one
baptism." Let them tremble then who
imagine that every creed leads by an easy path to the port of felicity;
and reflect seriously on the testimony of our Savior Himself, that
those are against Christ
who are not with Christ, and that they miserably scatter by the fact
that
they gather not with Him, and that consequently they will perish
eternally without any doubt, if they do not hold to the Catholic Faith,
and preserve it entire and without alteration...."
"15.
From this poisoned source of indifferentism flow that false and absurd,
or rather extravagant, maxim that liberty
of conscience should
be established and guaranteed
to each man -- a most contagious error, to which leads that absolute
and
unbridled liberty of opinion which for the ruin of Church and State
spreads over the world, and which some men, by unbridled impudence,
fear not to represent as advantageous to the Church. "And what more
certain death for souls,"
says Saint Augustine, "than the liberty of error!"
(Angelus
Press, 2918 Tracy Avenue, Kansas City, MI 64109; pages 11-12.)
In similar terms, Pope Pius IX declared against the error of indifferentism in his
Encyclical "Quanto Conficiamur moerore", August 10, 1863 :
"And here, beloved Sons and Venerable
Brothers, We should mention again and censure a very
grave error in which some Catholics are unhappily engaged, who believe
that
men living in error, and separated from the true faith and from
Catholic
unity, can attain eternal life. Indeed, this is certainly quite contrary to Catholic
teaching. It is known to Us and to you
that they who labor in invincible ignorance of our most holy religion
and who, zealously keeping the natural law and its precepts engraved in
the hearts of all by God and being ready to obey God, live an honest
and upright life, can, by the operating power of divine light and
grace, attain eternal life, since God who clearly beholds, searches,
and knows the minds, souls, thoughts, and habits of all men, because of
His great goodness and mercy, will by no means suffer anyone to be
punished with eternal torment who has not the guilt of deliberate sin. But, the Catholic dogma
that no one can be saved outside the Catholic Church is well-known; and also that those who are
obstinate toward the authority and definitions of the same Church, and
who persistently separate themselves from the unity of the Church, and
from the Roman Pontiff, the successor of PETER, to whom "the
guardianship of the vine has been entrusted by the Savior," cannot
obtain eternal salvation."
(Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1677, p. 424-425)
The following three errors (among
others) are also condemned by Pope
Pius IX,
i.e. those who believe them are anathematized:
1. "In the worship of any religion
whatever, men can find the way to eternal salvation, and can attain
eternal salvation." (I, 3, 17) (The numbers following each
statement refer to the INDEX "of
the Acts of PlUS lX, from which the Syllabus or Collection has been
excerpted) (Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1716, p. 437).
2. "We must have at least good hope
concerning the eternal salvation of all those who in no wise are in the
true Church of
Christ." (13) (Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1717, p. 437).
3. "Protestantism is nothing else than a
different form of the same true Christian religion, in which it is
possible to serve God as well as in the Catholic Church."
(5) (Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1718, p. 437)
Remember that an ex-cathedra
definition or declaration by a legitimate Pope has the force of an
dogmatic truth the refusal of which means excommunication and being cut
off from the Mystical Body of Christ, and therefore, being cursed
(anathematized). In addition, the definition or declaration (which
usually starts with "We firmly believe,
profess, and proclaim that ...." for a positive definition,
and "let him be anathema" for a
negative definition) is irreversible, meaning that no statement from
any other Pope afterward can contradict the previously declared dogma.
Pope Pius IX defined the infallibility of
the Pope as he chaired the First Vatican Council (session 4)
on July 18, 1870:
"And so We, adhering faithfully to the
tradition received from the beginning of the Christian faith, to the
glory of God, our
Savior, the elevation of the Catholic religion and the salvation of
Christian peoples, with the approbation of the sacred Council, teach
and explain that the dogma has been divinely revealed. That the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is,
when carrying out the duty of the pastor and teacher
of all Christians in accord with his supreme apostolic authority he
explains a doctrine of faith or morals to be held by the universal Church, through the
divine assistance
promised him in blessed Peter, operates
with
that infallibility with which the divine
Redeemer
wished that His church be instructed in defining doctrine on faith and
morals;
and so such definitions of the Roman Pontiff from himself, but not from the
consensus of the Church, are unalterable." (Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1839, p. 457)
"But if anyone presumes to contradict this
definition of Ours, which may God forbid: let him be anathema."
(Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 1840, p. 457)
Most recently, in his Speech to the Third General Assembly of Latin
American Bishops, January 28, 1979; and in the Radio Message on Eighth
Centenary
of St. Francis of Assisi, October 3, 1981, Pope John Paul II reaffirmed
the Sacred Tradition:
"The mystery of salvation is revealed to us
and is continued and accomplished in the Church . . . and from this
genuine and single source, like ' humble, useful, precious, and chaste'
water, it reaches the whole world . . .
"She must therefore he called upon,
respected, and served; for no one can have God for his Father if he
does not have the Church for his Mother. One cannot love Christ without
loving the Church Christ loves. The Spirit of the Church is the Spirit
of Christ, and to the extent to which one loves the Church of Christ
does he possess the Holy Spirit . . .
"We have to be conscious of and absorb this
fundamental and revealed truth, contained in the phrase hallowed by
Tradition: There is no salvation outside
the Church. From her alone flows surely
and fully the life-giving force
destined, in Christ and in His Spirit, to renew the whole of humanity,
and
therefore directing every human being to become a part of the Mystical
Body
of Christ." (Quoted from K.E.
Gillette, Jesus Christ Catholic, Victory Publication, 1983,
page 549)
To clarify the dogma that "there is no
salvation outside the Catholic Church", Pope Innocent III
repeated, in
a letter to Humbert, Archbishop of Arles, in 1201, what has been the
Sacred Tradition of the Church:
"We say that a distinction must be made,
that sin is twofold: namely, original and actual: original, which is
contracted without consent; and actual which is committed with consent. Original, therefore,
which is committed without consent, is remitted without consent through
the power of the sacrament; but actual, which is contracted with
consent, is not mitigated in the slightest without consent. . . . The punishment
of original sin is deprivation of the vision of God, but the punishment of
actual sin is the torments of everlasting hell ..." (Denzinger, Op. Cit., # 410, p. 161)
(Note: the vision of God is also called the Vision of Beatitude,
or the Beatific Vision.)
VI. As Maitreya changes the words of the Gospel, he is
called a liar by the Sacred Scripture.
By changing the Name of Jesus
(God and man, Son of God) in the Gospel of St. Matthew and St. Mark
into Esa (only
a creature), he changes the Sacred Scripture to point to him as
the Messiah or the Christ.
Proverbs 30:5-6. "Every word of God is fire
tried: he is a buckler to them that hope in him. Add not any thing to
his words, lest thou be reproved and found a liar."
(Note: Is fire tried... That is, most pure, like gold
purified by fire.)
Deuteronomy 4:2. "You shall not add to
the
word that I speak to you, neither shall you take away from it: keep the
commandments of the Lord your God which I command you."
V. It has been established beyond doubt above by
Maitreya's own teaching that he is a liar, a deceiver, and the
Anti-Christ. Then he is also a son
of Satan, the Devil, in exactly the same way that Our Lord
Jesus Christ said of the Jews who refused to believe in Him as the
Christ and the Messiah:
John 8:44. "You are of your father the devil:
and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the
beginning: and he stood not in the truth, because truth is not in him.
When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and
the father thereof."
VII. Conclusion: Why should one believe in a
liar, a deceiver, a blasphemer, a murderer of souls, an anathema, and a
son of Satan,
the Devil? And the Anti-Christ Maitreya is all of these.
In any case, remember the Anti-Christ Maitreya, in the end, will be
defeated by Jesus Christ and His army of Angels and Saints, and be cast
alive into Hell.
Apocalypse 19:19-21. "And I saw the beast and
the kings of the earth and their armies, gathered together to make war
with him that sat upon the horse and with his army. And the beast was
taken, and with him the false prophet who wrought signs before him,
wherewith he seduced them
who received the character of the beast and who adored his image.
These two were cast alive into the pool
of fire
burning with brimstone. And the rest were
slain
by the sword of him that sitteth upon the horse, which proceedeth out
of
his mouth: and all the birds were filled with their flesh."
"Who is like unto God?"
Created July 16, 1996. First version of this article: Feast of the
Holy Mother of God, January 1, 1998. First revision: January 17, 1998.